Differences :
research methods and research methodology - 2021
The above concept is defined as the science behind the methods used to gain knowledge. In other words, methods are the study of methods and the rationale behind why those particular methods are used. It is a way for the researcher to solve the problem systematically (e.g. to analyze the logic behind the steps taken by the researcher to answer the research question).
A research methodology provides a theoretical and philosophical framework covering all that is used at the beginning of a project to explain the reasons and logic behind the research methods chosen as well as to guide the research process.
To find the right research method for the chosen problem, Finding the accuracy of the results of the chosen method, and Ensuring the efficiency of the research method. Thus, a well-written method should be done as follows: Explain and explain the reasons for the overall methodological approach (qualitative, quantitative or mixed method) used for investigation, Indicate how research methods are applied to the study, Describe specific data collection methods, Provide adequate explanation of data analysis methods and procedures, and Provide logic for selected research methods. In order to be relevant to the research, the researcher must be informed of the research methods as well as the methodology. Researchers should be aware of the development of specific tests, as well as the ability to calculate average, position, mean and standard deviations.
In addition, researchers need to report how and when to apply certain research techniques to ensure which techniques apply to research problems. The decisions behind the design of the methodology must be clearly explained and the logic must be supported to critically analyze and evaluate the research by others [vi].
Therefore, the research method represents a component of the multi-dimensional concept of the research method. Research methods are just one aspect of the research methodology and provide avenues for finding solutions to research problems. However, the research method is the primary way to do research, and the method of research systems has entered into the use of research methods.
That being said, it is safe to know that both events are contingent on the basis of other existence.
Critics vs. constructive criticism Speaking of criticism, there is a clear difference between the two types of criticism, general and constructive criticism.
At some point in our lives we have all become an object of criticism; This can be in our personal life or in our professional life. First, let's define the meaning of the word criticism.
It can be understood as an expression of dislike. It is not easy for the purpose of criticism as it can be harmful and lower our confidence and self-esteem.
However, not all criticism is being made with the intention of denial. Sometimes criticism is made for the sole purpose of changing a person for the better.
This is known as constructive criticism. Through this article we will examine the difference between the two types of criticism; That is, criticism and constructive criticism
What is criticism?
Criticism, in general, is an evaluation of a person's performance.
Unlike a positive reaction that clearly stimulates a person's self-esteem, a negative reaction can lower a person's self-esteem. That person may lose confidence in his abilities. Criticism can be seen as a part of our lives.
For example, imagine a person who criticizes your hair, dress, work, the people you are involved with, such as your every move, and so on. Such criticisms do not have a solid basis, yet they can be very painful. In such cases, it is necessary to ignore such criticism.
One of the important aspects is that the person being criticized should remember not to get angry at th
e other person. He should be able to listen quietly and react and not take things personally.
Another important tip is to understand the purpose of criticism and to correct our mistakes. When criticisms are spoken, they can be classified primarily, Destructive criticism Constructive criticism Destructive criticism There is a negative reaction that hurts the person but constructive criticism is a negative reaction that is stated for the purpose of improving individual performance.
With this basic understanding we now move on to constructive criticism. Criticism can hurt a person's feelings
Definition of criticism and constructive critique:
Criticism involves evaluating an individual’s performance.
• Constructive criticism is the feedback given to a person so that he can make a positive change.
Attachment:
Criticism is a general term under which both constructive and destructive criticism is made.
Ingredients:
Criticism usually involves negative feedback that lowers a person's self-esteem
Constructive criticism involves feedback that brings about a positive change in the individual.
Nature:
Criticism can be malicious and harmful
• Constructive criticism is not malicious or harmful
Focus:
Criticism focuses on current failures
Constructive criticism focuses on future improvements.
Pictures courtesy: People by Samuel Johnson and Kolozswari Warkicomons (public domain)
The difference between constructive and destructive criticism Constructive vs. destructive criticism
What is the difference between constructive and destructive criticism? Constructive criticism is intended to improve the individual but not destructive criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment